Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/39777
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorSantos, Suellen Fonsêca da Conceição-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T12:15:55Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-30-
dc.date.available2024-08-09T12:15:55Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-04-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/39777-
dc.description.abstractThis master's thesis aimed to contribute to discussions and studies on argumentation in Biology. This study is structured in multipaper format and encompasses a collection consisting of two articles, the first being theoretical and the next empirical. The present research aims to analyze the development of argumentation in Natural Sciences textbooks considering the limitations and contributions to teaching. It is understood that textbooks that have an argumentative focus are instruments with the potential to contribute to student learning with regard to the development of argumentative skills. In general, this study is based on Toulmin's Argumentation Layout (2006), which is the main theoretical and methodological reference. To develop the first article, we aimed to theoretically discuss the potential of argumentation for teaching Natural Sciences. Scientific argumentation was taken into consideration as a teaching strategy and the role of textbooks in this process. For the development of the empirical article, an analytical tool proposed by Silva (2021), associated with Toulmin's Argumentative Layout (2006), was used as a reference. To this end, the arguments expressed in the statements of Mendel's First Law in High School Natural Sciences textbooks, approved by PNLD/2021, were analyzed. Our analyzes indicate that, for the most part, the arguments about Mendel's First Law recorded in the aforementioned books are not satisfactory. Arguments are considered satisfactory when all elements of an argument fulfill their function, in which, through justifications, a link can be established between the data and a given conclusion (TOUMIN, 2006). In view of these questions, it is relevant that more investigations focused on argumentation in Natural Sciences textbooks are carried out in order to reinforce the existence of this gap and, consequently, the urgency of adapting textbooks to the argumentative context.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ( CAPES)pt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal da Bahiapt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito/Embargadopt_BR
dc.subjectArgumentaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectEnsino de ciênciaspt_BR
dc.subjectLivro didáticopt_BR
dc.subjectPrimeira Lei de Mendelpt_BR
dc.subjectCiência - Estudo e ensinopt_BR
dc.subjectArgumentaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectCiência - Livros didáticospt_BR
dc.subjectMendel, Lei dept_BR
dc.subject.otherArgumentationpt_BR
dc.subject.otherScience educationpt_BR
dc.subject.otherTextbookpt_BR
dc.subject.otherMendel's First Lawpt_BR
dc.titleArgumentação no ensino de ciências da natureza: uma análise dos livros didáticos aprovados pelo PNLD/2021pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeArgumentation in teaching natural sciences: an analysis of textbooks approved by PNLD/2021pt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ensino, Filosofia e História das Ciências (PPGEFHC) pt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFBApt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCiências Biológicaspt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Teixeira, Elder Sales-
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6088538825437096pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Almeida, Rosileia Oliveira de-
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8537424533648716pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Silva, Rena de Paula Orofino-
dc.contributor.referee2Guimarães, Ana Paula Miranda-
dc.contributor.referee3Almeida, Rosileia Oliveira de-
dc.contributor.referee4Teixeira, Elder Sales-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0257313083035217pt_BR
dc.description.resumoThis master's thesis aimed to contribute to discussions and studies on argumentation in Biology. This study is structured in multipaper format and encompasses a collection consisting of two articles, the first being theoretical and the next empirical. The present research aims to analyze the development of argumentation in Natural Sciences textbooks considering the limitations and contributions to teaching. It is understood that textbooks that have an argumentative focus are instruments with the potential to contribute to student learning with regard to the development of argumentative skills. In general, this study is based on Toulmin's Argumentation Layout (2006), which is the main theoretical and methodological reference. To develop the first article, we aimed to theoretically discuss the potential of argumentation for teaching Natural Sciences. Scientific argumentation was taken into consideration as a teaching strategy and the role of textbooks in this process. For the development of the empirical article, an analytical tool proposed by Silva (2021), associated with Toulmin's Argumentative Layout (2006), was used as a reference. To this end, the arguments expressed in the statements of Mendel's First Law in High School Natural Sciences textbooks, approved by PNLD/2021, were analyzed. Our analyzes indicate that, for the most part, the arguments about Mendel's First Law recorded in the aforementioned books are not satisfactory. Arguments are considered satisfactory when all elements of an argument fulfill their function, in which, through justifications, a link can be established between the data and a given conclusion (TOUMIN, 2006). In view of these questions, it is relevant that more investigations focused on argumentation in Natural Sciences textbooks are carried out in order to reinforce the existence of this gap and, consequently, the urgency of adapting textbooks to the argumentative context.pt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFaculdade de Educaçãopt_BR
dc.type.degreeMestrado Acadêmicopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Dissertação (PPGEFHC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Dissertação de Suellen Fonsêca da Conceição Santos.pdfDissertação de mestreado de Suellen Fonsêca da Conceição Santos1 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.